Building the Bugs

Share

How the Hornets Return

To Tank or Not to Tank

Unbelievable. The Charlotte Bobcats organization actually made a great decision. As first reported Friday evening by CBS Sports, the Queen City’s original (and best) NBA team monikor is coming back home, likely beginning in November of 2014. Great news but if the franchise has to wait eighteen months for the teal & purple, what on earth is their on-court game plan between now and then? Here’s the dilemma:

Remember when Miami won 27 games in a row earlier this season? The Bobcats have won just 28 games OVER THE PAST TWO SEASONS COMBINED. As if their early history wasn’t terrible enough, the Cats have cemented their status as a national joke since launching OPERATION TANK twenty-four months ago. The franchise can’t afford to begin the Hornets Era as a re-skinned farce in new duds. Credibility must be nurtured and harvested before Super Hugo dunks from his first trampoline.

Simultaneously, no Draft since 2008 has featured a bigger potential superstar than 2014’s top prospect, Andrew Wiggins. Do you bet the franchise on bottoming out for a third consecutive season in the slim hopes that Lottery ping pong balls bounce in your favor? Or, do you use this offseason’s cap space, draft pick and coaching search to further upgrade your roster, disregarding Lottery odds in order to build excitement through actual wins and player development?

No mistake, Andrew Wiggins is going to be very good, perhaps awesome. He’s been compared to a young Tracy McGrady and for those who don’t remember, young T-Mac was a stud. But here’s the problem: there is absolutely ZERO guarantee, no matter how many games you throw, you’ll be able to get him.

A Little NBA Draft History

Since 1985, only FOUR times has the league’s worst team won the Lottery. That’s four times in twenty seven years. The FIFTH WORST team has actually had more luck, winning it five times. Betting your franchise’s future on the Draft Lottery is just slightly less irresponsible than betting your personal financial future on the Powerball.

Worse yet, if the team tanks and doesn’t wind up winning a Top 3 Pick, they’ve essentially sacrificed an entire season — in which they could further develop players and nurture local fans — for the measley reward of drafting Marcus Smart or Aaron Gordon. Note to pro-tankers, this scenario is by far the most likely given the Lottery’s odds.

In fact, this type of scenario is the very the reason Commissioner Stern implemented the Lottery system to begin with. Franchises should be forced to remain competitive because it turns out that you can royally piss off a fanbase by purposefully trying to lose.

Finally, two outstanding articles on the Draft were published shortly after the Hornets news broke.

Take a few minutes to read each of these if you haven’t already. Then go back and scan our Draft Retrospective Part I (Part II will be published later this week). Notice a pattern here?

Perhaps four times in a decade, a ready-made NBA star enters the Draft. No amount of organizational dysfunction can prevent that player from achieving greatness. Lebron, Durant, MJ, Bird, Magic. But the vast majority of the time, it is the organization itself that must shape the talented clay into All-Stars and Superstars, especially now that most top picks are one-and-done 19 year olds. The Indiana Pacers enter the Eastern Conference Finals with not a single Top 5 pick on the roster. Paul George, D.J. Augustin and Tyler Hansbrough were late Lottery selections while Lance Stephenson, Roy Hibbert, Danny Granger, David West and George Hill all arrived in the NBA via the mid-first round or later.

Developing Prospects

Meanwhile, what have the Bobcats accomplished with their ten Lottery picks in nine years? At some point, after noticing the differences in all of the team’s “failed prospects”, you begin to realize that the one constant in all of this nonsense is the Bobcats organization itself.

In the great David Mamet stage and screenplay “Glengarry Glen Ross”, we are introduced to two primary types of salesmen. The Ed Harris/Jack Lemmon types, perpetually moaning about the quality of their sales leads – yearning for the day in which they’ll finally land those precious ripe prospects, the “Glengarry leads”. In contrast we have Al Pacino’s character, Ricky Roma, whose leads are no better than Harris’ or Lemmon’s but through shrewdness and skill, coasts to being the agency’s top rep month after month. When Alec Baldwin’s head honcho character arrives to deliver the Glengarry leads midway through the film, he teases Harris and Lemmon with this:

“These are the new leads. These are the Glengarry leads. And to you they’re gold, and you don’t get them. Why? Because to give them to you would be throwing them away. They’re for closers.”

The Bobcats have never been closers. The Hornets, for all of their mistakes, were. If Michael Jordan, Rod Higgins and Rich Cho want to truly turn this franchise around, they need to focus less on where they pick their Draft prospects and more on building an organization that can actually develop one.

- A.S. Chin

Tags: , , , ,

6 Responses to “Building the Bugs”

  1. Ben
    May 20, 2013 at 3:03 pm #

    Here’s the thing: it’s not just Wiggins, it’s Wiggins, Parker, Randle, Harrison, and Smart. You can still develop your players without winning (something Dunlap didn’t do by benching MKG), but there’s not really a better alternative. Taking on terrible contracts for players the quality of J-Rich, Stack Jack, an Diaw isn’t going to bring this team to a championship.

    The question is whether you want to be a playoff contender (Milwaukee) or a championship contender (OKC). Going with Cho’s plan is far more risky, but the upside is much higher. What are you really shooting for?

    • Mike
      May 20, 2013 at 5:10 pm #

      Yea – the Bobcats may have taken too long to try to build their squad. They can either swing for a home run, or settle for just getting on base.

  2. HornCats
    May 20, 2013 at 3:11 pm #

    This is a little over the top with criticism if you ask me.

    The Bobcats are still the youngest franchise in the league, go back and find a better example of an expansion franchise thats exceeded what the Bobcats have done without a number 1 pick or really even a bit of luck ever going their way. The Wolves, Grizz are just now becoming worthy opponents 18 years later and still aren’t real title contenders. The Raptors are equally as bad as the Bobcats. I’m not saying this justifies the Bobcats record… but it just shows that starting from scratch makes it near impossible to become a worthwhile player in the league.

    Are the Bobcats terrible… yes, the record shows that. Is any move they’ve ever gotten supposedly wrong going to change them into some kind of title hunter? No. Adding in a player that “we missed on in the draft” that is playing well elsewhere doesn’t mean he will play well here. Expansion franchises come in and flounder for a while. Its only natural. Being uber-critical and down right snarky about what if’s and coulda-beens doesn’t make you smart, only Captain of the completely obvious. It only perpetuates the myth that in some alternate timeline the Bobcats COULD HAVE been great with different management, when in reality that just isn’t true. Expansion franchises don’t win.

    With fans like these….

    • Mike
      May 20, 2013 at 5:09 pm #

      I think I hear what you’re saying. It’s tough to run through the whole stack of the Bobcats screw-ups, and still keep the faith.

      The big problem with blindly accepting that expansion teams just suck, is to assume that there is no way to improve. Any organization, or individual is capable of improvement.

      The Bobcats have done enough to draw a little attention to their team. Some of us have even decided to follow them, and root for their success. Unfortunately, the club has made a ton of critical mistakes. It’s far easier to just stop following them, and start watching another team that has achieved much greater success. It takes an obsessed fan to dissect the Bobcats’ errors and outline the strategic challenges ahead of them. To cite their past failures helps to set a measuring stick for how their upcoming moves are evaluated.

      We could simply nod our heads and agree that Adam Morrison was a fine selection with the #3 pick in the draft. But, I think it’s worth trying to understand how the hell the Bobcats dug themselves into their current state.

      • HornCats
        May 20, 2013 at 5:46 pm #

        Fair enough and I’m not suggesting we bury our heads in the ground and pretend its all ok. Its not, we have to improve.

        But to say Adam wasn’t a fine selection is to say that Rudy Gay WOULD have been. And we just can’t know that. I think Rudy Gay in Charlotte would have been the same awful mess Adam was. Its just too much workload to put on a player. Too many holes to pretend that one guy would fix any of it.

        I just don’t think its fair to constantly berate a front office that had the deck stacked against them from the beginning. It’s placing blame on someone for not building a champion from scratch, when literally no one has ever done it before. To point and laugh and pretend we know the right decisions they should have made is all hindsight GMing.

        But, I agree with you. It takes an obsessed fan, to discuss and dissect past moves of a failed franchise. I just get annoyed at the air of superiority some flaunt when discussing it. Saying the Bobcats aren’t closers, as if anyone in the same situation could have been.

  3. RK
    May 21, 2013 at 6:54 pm #

    Grandmama II… draft Anthony Bennett UNLV… that will “Bring Back The Buzz”

Leave a Reply